Revelations and Parkers Back Essay - 928 Words

Revelations and Parker’s Back nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The story â€Å"Revelations† by Flannery O’Connor portrays the character of Ms. Turpin as a very hypocritical Christian. It’s absurd how obvious she is in her view of society; it could not be less unchristian like. Her opinions towards other people and their intelligence are Ms. Turpin’s greatest flaw. â€Å"Parker’s Back† also written by Flannery O’Connor is just the opposite of Revelations, Parker spends his entire life trying to fill a void that has grown so deep inside him it becomes unbearable. His continual dislike and downgrading of Christianity plays into his problems even more. The stories have very unique approaches, both of which prove to be very intriguing.†¦show more content†¦Mrs. Turpin explains her views when she says â€Å"If its one thing I am, its grateful. When I think who all I could have been besides myself and what I got, a little of everything, I just feel like shouting.â€Å" Her character does not seem to be a very honest character; she puts on an act around everybody to make sure she can derive from them what she needs. A perspective on this from Dorothy T. McFarland in a formalist reading was that â€Å"O’Connor obviously felt that Mrs. Turpin’s belief in her own goodness was, if anything, more of an obstacle to the salvation of her soul that an outright commitment to evil.â€Å"(perspectives,409) She always seemed to think she was doing right, never seeing anything wrong until the end of the story. After being called a wart hog from hell she opens her eyes and sees the truth. A good way of understanding the symbolic ness of this is best put by Todd Heldt when they say â€Å"no amount of cleansing will ever change the essence, no amount of good work or intellectual justification will change the sinful nature of human beings.†(Browse) She was finally realizing the concept of her being a bad Christian. She finally comes to terms with her sense of herself. The other story â€Å"Parker’s Back† takes another unique route. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The character of Parker is that of an honest but sometimes deceiving lower class Negro. He is a very unintelligentShow MoreRelatedThe Role of Abraham Maslow in Life of Pi by Yann Martel1685 Words   |  7 Pagesreligion. He is already in the beginning phase of self-actualization until major tragedy of a shipwreck while on his way to Canada causes him to be stranded in the middle of the ocean with a tiger on a lifeboat. He is now left with only the clothes on his back and limited supply of food to savor until he is saved. This key event of the shipwreck is a symbol of Pi having to start the pyramid of needs all over again from the basics. In order to stay sane in a vast ocean with a tiger he must fulfill each levelRead MoreHow Does Religion Influence Reality And What We Perceive2265 Words   |  10 Pagesanimals and two of the ship s crew. The animals and humans that accompany Pi are symbolic of each other. When a zebra attempts to flee the ship, it jumps in to the lifeboat and breaks its leg. The human counterpart to the zebra is the Sailor. He also breaks his leg while getting to the lifeboat, and is ultimately killed by the cook or hyena. Eventually, Pi discovers the bengal tiger that has also taken shelter on the lifeboat. The tiger was mistakenly given the name Richard Parker, after his captor, butRead MoreCase Study : Canary Mcclinton, A Big Thing For Me And My Family1778 Words   |  8 Pagespatients get the best sort of treatment as possible. I interact with patients more often, and I feel that things look much different than they did back then. In the past, I had little ideas concerning the handling of sick people, conducting first aid, and dressing of wounds, all of which I’m now well acquainted. The last experience I recall involved a nurse who back then was undergoing a cardiovascular operation. Despite the difficult moment that the patient went through, we tirelessly went with him tillRead MoreLife Of Pi Where During Pi s Journey2033 Words   |  9 Pagesbrought from a discovery. This is evident in Ang Lee’s film Life of Pi where during Pi’s journey and hardships lead to his new understanding of faith contrasted to his discovery to survive on his journey, seen through his relationship with Richard Parker and his belief that animals have souls, lead to vast ramifications. Similarly, in Julian Barnes’ short story Marriage Lines the return to the Island bring new understandings of his past memories but also brings the ramifications of the loss of wifeRead MoreRa 6713 â€Å"Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees†1220 Words   |  5 PagesConsensus Orientation * Equity * Effectiveness and Efficiency * Accountability Ethical Bases * RULES * RESULTS * RELATIONSHIPS * TRADITION RULES as an Ethical Basis - We believe in them as coming by divine revelation. - With authority or of our community. The utilitarian principle focuses our attention on results or the consequences of our actions. It has been expressed traditionally as â€Å"Seeking the Greatest Good for the Greatest Number† RELATIONSHIPSRead MoreHamlet And Life Of Pi Compare And Contrast5239 Words   |  21 Pagesprotagonist characters come out of these events more enlightened on how the world can be perceived and how they have changed as individuals . In Shakespeare Hamlet, the protagonists innocent and idealistic behaviours are brought into a cataclysmic self-revelations on his world that he lives in , thereby leading to a understanding of certain perspectives of life, similarly in Life of Pi by Yann Martel the protagonist Pi idealistic and positive way of life is catastrophically taken from him resulting in aRead MoreThe Genesis Of The Mid Twentieth Century America3651 Words   |  15 Pagesthreat of reality – the desperation and frustration of truth. Despite their desire to live in that moment of allure and retreat in the Jazzonia, this jazzy getaway is only temporary. With the entrance of daylight, Hughes’ Harlem escape is brought back to the harsh reality of everyday life and is a stark contrast to the dark appeal of Jazzonia. Often clinging to the blackness of night, however, many Harlemites found inexplicable comfort in its entrance at the end of the day. Hughes introduces thisRead MoreAnalysis Of Hamlet And Life Of Pi5282 Words   |  22 Pagesprotagonists to enter a spiralling path of terrifying truths. Ultimately, after the catastrophic events occur the protagonist s characters come out of these events more enlightened on how the world can be perceived and how they have changed as individuals . In Shakespeare, Hamlet, the protagonists innocent and idealistic behaviours are brought into a cataclysmic self-revelations of his world that he lives in , thereby leading to a understanding of certain perspectives of li fe, similarly in Life ofRead MoreHow On High And Not Be A Scrambled Egg3321 Words   |  14 PagesDestiney and the President needs to face issues like sending soldiers to war. Life is hard, but it is not impossible. In order to survive in the world people need to be able to bounce back after life knocks them off their feet. It is that simple. In order to survive a person needs to rebound back. Being able to rebound back takes resiliency, courage and faith. Only God knows how high someone will jump. It is up to the individual to decide to take the leap of faith and try again after life knocks themRead MoreAnalysis Of Homer s The Odyssey 2311 Words   |  10 Pagesindicating that Troy s walls would never fall without the help of Philoctetes s magical bow – a weapon that once belonged to Hercules. As the play opens, Odysseus has therefore returned to the island – along with Neoptolemus – in order to retrieve the bow. This plan would allow Odysseus to leav e Philoctetes in his exile while still getting what he wanted. However, Neoptolemus views Odysseus plan as simple treachery and reveals all to Philoctetes. Upon discovering his old enemy s new need for his

Surprised By Joy By Lewis And Confessions - 1411 Words

Surprised by Joy by Lewis and Confessions by Augustine are not two works that are often analyzed side by side although they are both autobiographical and written by men greatly influential to the Christian faith. Since Confessions contains many different elements which Augustine explores to better understand the nature of God, this paper will focus on Augustine’s section â€Å"Happiness (Beatta Vita)† as compared and contrasted with Lewis’ chapters â€Å"Checkmate† and â€Å"Beginning†. A preliminary glance of these works may lead the reader to think that they are very similar, despite the differences in publishing time, Surprised By Joy was published in 1955, while Confessions was published in 398 AD. This is not entirely false, as both â€Å"Checkmate†, â€Å"Beginning† and â€Å"Happiness† are all largely focused on the relationship of God and joy and utilize a similar structure. Although Augustine and Lewis’ four-part structure initially appears complimentary because of similar themes, these structures contrast as a result of differing allegories. At first, Augustine and Lewis’ structural methods for â€Å"Happiness† and â€Å"Checkmate† seem similar. Both rely on a four-part structure in order to explain their process for understanding joy. The first part of Augustine’ structure is to place joy as a universal concept. This is because, in Augustine’s mind, joy is something that transcends all language and cultural barriers. Macdonald describes this first component of Augustine’ structure as â€Å"Everyone wants toShow MoreRelatedLanguage and the Destiny of Man12402 Words   |  50 Pagespicture of the solitary thinker, who retired for a time to a house in the Netherlands, and, clothed in his dressing gown, seated at the fireplace, looking undecided at a blank page, reflecting alone and writing down for several nights, almost as a confession, potential answers to his long deliberations on the existence on anything certain in the world of knowledge. This image probably appears to those who feel themselves filled with loneliness and the sheer freedom of metaphysical thought. It is asRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pagesrelevant details. The common metaphor here is that their audience will fail to see the forest because they’re being told to look at too many individual trees. Being Pseudoprecise The nineteenth-century American writer Mark Twain once said he was surprised to learn that the Mississippi River was 1,000,003 years old. He hadnt realized that rivers were that old. When asked about the 3, he answered with a straight face that three years earlier a geologist had told him the Mississippi River was aRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagescompetent managers tend to progress the most when engaging in skill development exercises, so don’t dismiss a skill just because you feel that it is an area of strength. We encourage you to take time to complete these assessment instruments. You will be surprised with what you learn if you complete them honestly and as accurately as you can. INTRODUCTION 19 Table 4 SECTION The Organization of Each Chapter CONTENTS Instruments designed to identify your current level of skill competency, your stylesRead MoreStrategic Human Resource Management View.Pdf Uploaded Successfully133347 Words   |  534 Pagesmarket-priced transactions between network components. For external networks, at one end of the spectrum are dynamic net-works that have lead companies that basically act as brokers, outsourcing virtually all activities to a changing set of companies. Lewis Galoob toys, with only 100 employees, provides an example of such a network that outsources manufacturing, design, development, distribution, and collection of accounts receivable. At the other end of the external spectrum are stable networks in which

Case Study of Child with Autism free essay sample

I became increasingly interested in Autism since I had the opportunity to work alongside kids with Autism this summer. Seeing how their minds worked and how they processed information was astounding to me. Ever since this experience, I have fallen in love with children with Autism and I am always thriving to learn more about them. With this being said, I am looking to do my research on a child with Autism. I will be looking into the question how does Autism affect language development in children? Under this broad topic I will be specifically looking into why their pragmatic language is impaired. To find my information I will interview my child’s parents. I will do my own observations both in the home and at school. Finally, I will research scholarly articles that are based off of good scientific research in my subject field. I want to become more informed about children with Autism and why their language development is impaired in the ways that it is. In doing so, I feel that I can become a more informed teacher which I can use to my advantage in my classroom. I will know how to make children with Autism that are in my class successful both in class and in social situations. Section 2: Research Article #1 Measuring Pragmatic Language in Speakers with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Comparing the Children’s Communication Checklist—2 and the Test of Pragmatic Language â€Å"1 in 165 children† (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 204). The number of children that are prevalent with some type of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) as stated by Joanne Volden and Linda Phillips. It is a statistic that is on the rise and highly debated. It is a statistic that greatly affects classrooms across the nation. And yet, how to we help these children to the best of our abilities? An aspect that is being highly overlooked is pragmatic impairments. Children with an ASD have a greater chance of having a pragmatic dysfunction than do ‘typical’ children (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 205). How do we help children that are having these issues? How do we even diagnose these types of Language Development impairments? This article points to two of the ways this is being done: The Test of Pragmatic Language and The Children’s Communication Checklist – 2. This article examines the validity of two tests: The Test of Pragmatic Language (TOPL) and The Children’s Communication Checklist – 2 (CCC – 2) (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 205). Each test was made to identify â€Å"pragmatic impairments† in children with high functioning ASD (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 205). The study identifies the difficulties that children with ASD have with pragmatic language –these children have â€Å"peculiar and out of place (communication) in ordinary conversation† (Rutter, 1965, p. 41); may â€Å"fail to develop (a) topic by contributing new, relevant information† among other minor things (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p.  204). Each test was developed to measure pragmatic dysfunctions in children so they may receive the support needed to thrive in everyday life. â€Å"Pragmatic language has proven (to be) difficult to assess†¦ (because) the (general) structure of formal testing procedures fails to capture f lexible adjustment to changing circumstances† (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 205). The TOPL test â€Å"samples a range of typically developing pragmatic behaviors† (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 205). The test compares students that have typical development pragmatic skills and students that have been diagnosed with high functioning ASD. The CCC-2, on the other hand is â€Å"designed to screen for clinically significant communication problem of any type and (identifies) pragmatic language impairments† (Phillips, Volden, 2010 p. 205-206). So while the CCC-2 does test of pragmatic language impairments it also screens for communication impairments as well. The TOPL test is scored using a summary score called the â€Å"Language Quotient† (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 207). The Language Quotient is expressed as a â€Å"standard score with a mean of 100 (SD = 15) (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p.  207). According to Phillips and Volden, Language Quotients of â€Å"70-79 are interpreted as poor, and quotients below 70 are interpreted as very poor† (2010, p. 207). The cutoff score indicating a pragmatic impairment in the child was designated as 79 (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 207). The CCC-2 on the other hand derives two composite scores that are interpreted allowing for a greater variety of information to be processed and taken into account while interpreting whether or not a child with high functioning ASD has pragmatic issues or not. These two composite scores are the GCC that is expressed by a standard score â€Å"with a mean of 100 (SD = 15) and the SIDI (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 207). If a GCC score is less than 80, it indicated a communicative impairment: not a pragmatic impairment (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 207). On the other hand, a negative SIDI score represents a pragmatic issue. â€Å"If the SIDI score is -15 or below Bishop (2003) suggests that pragmatic language impairment is present regardless of the GCC score (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 207). So what does all of this mean? It was shown that both tests can in fact show whether or not a child with high functioning ASD has an issue with pragmatics. But how valid are these tests? Both tests ended with different results. The TOPL test showed that â€Å"9 out of 16 students with ASD were pragmatically impaired† while the CCC-2 identified â€Å"13 out of the 16† (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 208). While it is known that students with ASD do in fact have pragmatic impairments is there a chance that not every student will have this type of impairment? It is hard to tell what test was more reliable in this situation for biases and cultural considerations were not taken into effect. However, it is a start. The article states that â€Å"the CCC-2 would be better at identification because the test included items designated to tap a broad range of pragmatic symptoms that are frequently reported as characteristic of ASD†¦. that would not occur in the course of typical development† (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 209). This study does prove to have a lot of vital information in regards to pragmatic dysfunctions in children with high functioning ASD. However, it does say that the study was small: â€Å"This study is limited by its small sample size and by restricting participation to those who had structural language scores within typical limits† (Phillips, Volden, 2010, p. 210). With that being said, it would not be reliable to extrapolate the information from this study to schools across the nation. This study only used children that were diagnosed as high functioning ASD. It would be important that other studies be done using children across the spectrum to see if the results were reliable. It would also be important to use other students with Intellectual Disabilities or even students that have been formally diagnosed with a Language Disorder to see how the validity of each test would withstand against these types of children. And although there is a lot that this study could have done further to prove their point, the information is still interesting and conclusive in its own regard. It is important that these types of tests continue to grow and evolve in our everyday world. If these tests can further prove to diagnose students with pragmatic impairments, it would be incredible in the world of teaching. Students with pragmatic impairments are being over looked and swept under the rug because they are not diagnosed as atypical in this aspect of Language Development. And while not all children with high functioning ASD have pragmatic impairments, there are large numbers of children that do exhibit these dysfunctions. As teachers, it is vital that these children, diagnosed with ASD or not, get the necessary treatment plans and resources to allow them to excel. Whether that be through an IEP or 504 plan, students need not be ignored because there is not a way to formally diagnose their language dysfunction. And while this article does state that the CCC-2 may be the better route to diagnose these children, it is important to use either the CCC-2 or the TOPL test rather than nothing at all as a start to diagnose a child. Once a child is assessed and diagnosed not only will that child be able to learn in the school setting but in the home setting as well. For although it may not always be good to label a child, having that label will allow for the child to have adequate and necessary treatment to allow for further success. Pragmatic dysfunctions, when treated early, can make a large impact on a child’s life. Growing up to know when the right time is to say certain things can be essential when trying to obtain a job or just talking in public. As teachers, these language issue needs to be taken into account more often and more seriously. Children are slipping through the cracks because teachers are uneducated as to how to formally diagnose and help these issues. Article #2 Brief Report: Pragmatic Language in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Relationships in Measures of Ability and Disability Pragmatic language is something that we use on a day to day basis whether we know it or not. Talking to a single person, talking to a group, or even listening to another person talk is all included in pragmatic language skills. Children, especially children with Autism, often lack pragmatic language. Children with Autism generally have more difficulties with pragmatic language than do any other children. If tested, they could even be diagnosed as having a pragmatic language dysfunction. Their speech is often considered â€Å"peculiar and out of place in ordinary conversations† and â€Å"irrelevant† (Bryson, Coolican, Garon, Volden, White, 2008, p.  388). â€Å"Pragmatics is consistently agreed upon as the domain that is specifically and universally impaired in Autism Spectrum Disorders† (Bryson, Coolican, Garon, Volden, White, 2008, p. 388). With this all being said, why is pragmatic language so often pushed to the side? Should pragmatic language be considered an important factor in considering a person’s long-term ability to function effectivel y in his or her community? Students with Autism may or may not have structural language difficulties paired with pragmatic language difficulties as well. Do structural language difficulties predict pragmatic language difficulties? This study that was done measured the â€Å"contributions of nonverbal cognitive and structural language skills to the prediction of pragmatic language scores† (Bryson, Coolican, Garon, Volden, White, 2008, p. 391). The study was done on â€Å"37 children aged 6-13 years who met the criteria of Autism/ASD† (Bryson, Coolican, Garon, Volden, White, 2008, p. 389). This study showed that pragmatic language, as measured by the TOPL, is strongly related to, but not dictated by, structural language. Structural language plays a part in pragmatic language, but it is not the driving force behind it. A student with Autism may have nearly perfect structural language but lack pragmatic language. Whereas another student may lack structural language and pragmatic language. Every student is different. These results simply state that structural language and pragmatic language are related in some way. How they are related, however, was not stated. The study also shows, as predicted, that if a child has better pragmatic skills, they were linked to fewer ASD communicative symptoms. Better pragmatic language was also linked to fewer symptoms in the social domain. These findings underscores how central the theme is between ASD symptoms and social communication. This study, done mostly on children with High-Functioning Autism, increases the evidence that children with Autism cannot help the way that they act in social settings. They cannot help that they can’t hold a conversation, among other things. Children with Autism are different: in a good way. Although they may not be able to communicate effectively and appropriately, they are so good at so many different things. Communication just happens to not necessarily be one of those things. This study has its flaws. The study should not be extrapolated to large groups, although the results are informative and interesting. The study was only done on a small sample size. The children that were selected â€Å"functioned within normal limits on most measures† (Bryson, Coolican, Garon, Volden, White, 2008, p. 392). Having a larger sample size with children of different ‘functions’ will prove to be more effective in showing the same results, assuming they will come out the same way. So, what is the point of this study? It can be stated that students with ASD have pragmatic language difficulties. It can be stated that students with ASD have structural language difficulties. It can be stated that these are intertwined within one another. But what does this all mean in the life of the child? How can this information better the life of a student wit ASD? The study suggests the importance of developing a â€Å"comprehensive (assessment) of pragmatic language to help document a person’s level of disability† (Bryson, Coolican, Garon, Volden, White, 2008, p. 392). With this information, professionals will be able to intervene in functional, community based contexts so students can develop social skills needed across all domains. Students will be able to grow individually to further their importance in their community. Should pragmatic language be considered an important factor in considering a person’s long-term ability to function effectively in his or her community? With the information given, all signs point to yes. Pragmatic language is an essential part in a student’s life. It allows students to function in everyday social situations. Students that lack pragmatic language are set back because of their inability to function ‘normally’. â€Å"It stands at the intersection of language and social skills, impairments central to defining features of ASD† (Bryson, Coolican, Garon, Volden, White, 2008, p. 391). Article # 3: Diagnostic Differences of Autism Spectrum Disorder s and Pragmatic Language Impairment Children with Autism are generally associated with having pragmatic language impairments. However, not all children that have pragmatic language impairments have Autism. So, along with difficulty in social communication settings, what else do these children have in common? Do children with Autism get labeled as having a pragmatic language impairments because they actually have a pragmatic language impairment or do their Autism symptoms overlap with those of pragmatic language impairments? Do children with Autism and children with pragmatic language impairments show comparable levels of behaviors associated with the ‘autism triad’ (Cornish, Frombonne, Reisinger, 2011, p. 1701)? The study sought out to answer these questions. The Autism triad is composed of three components. Component one involved the social and emotional aspect of development. Children with Autism in this area will have trouble with making friends, managing unstructured parts of the day, and working co-operatively. The second component is language and communication. Children with Autism will have difficulties in this area including difficulties understanding jokes and sarcasm, social use of language, literal interpretations, and body language and facial expressions. Finally, the third and final component of the Autism triad is flexibility of thought (imagination). In this area, children will struggle with coping with changes in routine and empathy. The study was done with â€Å"forty-one children with communication impairments aged 7-15 years† (Cornish, Frombonne, Reisinger, 2011, p. 1696). Each child was tested using both the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). The purpose of these tests was to compare the scores of children with ASD and children with PLI. These tests would then show whether the children have comparable levels of behaviors associated with the autism triad. The diagnostic cut-off scores of each test were examined and measured. Overall, the results from the ADOS and SCQ showed that children with PLI have less severe impairments related to the autism triad as compared to children with ASD. However, the sub domains of these tests could not always differentiate between children with PLI and children with ASD in reference to their scores. When the combined measures were being used, it was possible to separate out the children with PLI and children with ASD that show signs of PLI.  7 cases could not be differentiated (Cornish, Frombonne, Reisinger, 2011, p. 1701). Therefore, it was concluded that using ADOS and SCQ alone were not strong predictors in differentiating between ASD and PLI. This study then goes on to support the theory that there are subtle differences between ASD and PLI. Children with PLI have â€Å"significant difficulties socializing† (Cornish, Frombonne, Reisinger, 2011, p. 1702). Because of these difficulties, ch ildren with PLI have an increased risk for problem behaviors related to Autism. The difficulties that these children have in relation to their socialization lead to an increased risk of frustration and anxiety, and in turn â€Å"an increase in expression of abnormal behaviors† (Cornish, Frombonne, Reisinger, 2011, p. 1702). This same relationship was not found in children with ASD. This may be due to the fact that children with ASD lack a sense of awareness of their surroundings and do not allow their surroundings to get to them in the way that children with PLI may. This is not true, however, of all children with ASD. This study examined children with ASD that were not diagnosed in having PLI. Children that are comorbid with ASD and PLI will experience the frustration, the anxiety, and the increased behaviors. Even some children that have ASD but not PLI could essentially still show these frustrations in social contexts. Looking back at the Autism triad after reading this article, children with PLI and children with ASD really only share equal difficulties in one area: language and communication. And not to say that this will always be what is shared amongst these two different diagnoses, but this is what will be most common amongst the two. The overlapping symptoms does not mean that children who have been diagnosed with PLI should also be diagnosed with ASD, but rather that they share common characteristics about their speech and communication, especially in social situations. Article #4 An Exploration of Causes of Non-Literal Language Problems in Individuals with Asperger Syndrome It is known that children with Autism show difficulties in pragmatic language. â€Å"One of the key features characteristic of individuals with high functioning Autism is a marked disruption to the ability to engage in social communication† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p.  311). The question that is never brought up, however, is why these children are at an increased risk for having pragmatic language difficulties. Article after article, case study after case study all talk about the signs and symptoms of pragmatic language impairments (PLI) in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). They talk about how to test for PLI and interv ention techniques that can prove to be beneficial for the child. This article explores what others do not: the why of pragmatic language. Knowing the cause of pragmatic language impairments in children should essentially lead to potential remedies to help treat children that are affected. There are two competing hypotheses that are correlated with pragmatic deficits. The first is Theory of Mind (TOM). This may be â€Å"the most prominent position on the causation of social communication in ASD† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p. 311). TOM encompasses the ability to form representations of â€Å"other individual’s mental states, and, furthermore, to use those representations to understand predict, and judge others’ utterances and behavior† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p.  312). The ability to infer mental states of another individual is pivotal in engaging in effective pragmatic communication. â€Å"Deficits in TOM have been observed in individuals with ASD across a range of age groups and IQ ability† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p. 312). The comprehension of non-literal language relies on a person ’s TOM capacity. Therefore, children with ASD who have difficulty understanding metaphors or irony in another person’s speech could essentially blame their lack of TOM. With a lack of TOM, children will not be able to communicate effectively with another person. Their speech will be egocentric and will lack empathy. The second hypothesis that is correlated with pragmatic deficits seen in children with ASD is the notion of weak central coherence (WCC). WCC is not as strong of a thesis as TOM is. WCC refers to how language is processed. It’s argued that, according to the WCC theory, â€Å"language is processed in a kind of fragmented isolation without reference to the social context in which it occurs† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p. 312). In accordance with WCC, children with ASD display difficulties when they interpret words according to the context of the sentence given. â€Å"WCC predicts that individuals with Autism should be impaired in their ability to achieve local linguistic coherence† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p. 313). Children with Autism are also less able to â€Å"draw coherence inferences, or themes across, a set of statements† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p. 313). While these two theories are seemingly informational and reliable, their validity is questionable. Therefore, a study was performed to establish validity among the two theories. â€Å"The primary aim of this study was to compare the competing theories of social interference† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p.  315). Two predictions were made about TOM and WCC: â€Å"If deficits in TOM underlie pragmatic ability, then deficits in social interference should be significantly associated with deficits in pragmatic ability. However, impairments in social inference making should not be associated with either general inference ability, or the ability to integrate perceptual information. If WCC underlies pragmatic ability, then the ability to organize perceptual details into meaningful wholes should be significantly associated with the ability to make pragmatic inferences. Furthermore, this ability should be related to the capacity to make general and social inferences, as both these abilities require the capacity of drawing together disparate sources of information to infer meaning† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p. 315). The results showed that â€Å"students with ASD were found to be impaired on both the mental inference questions and the non-mental control inference questions† (Martin McDonald, 2004, p. 325). Therefore, their difficulty with TOM reasoning extended from one activity to the next, whereas WCC was only seen a small portion of the activities performed. WCC was assessed and found to not be related to pragmatic language ability. However, this study was done solely on testing children on processing visual-spatial information. It is unclear and not studied whether WCC would play a role â€Å"in the processing of auditory verbal information† in accordance with pragmatic communication (Martin McDonald, 2004, p. 326). More research, of course, would have to be done to replicate the information done in this study. This small sample size that was used has limited power in showing the true difference between the two competing theories that are TOM and WCC. Furthermore, with more research, it could be shown what other types of language deficits are applicable using these explanations. Article #5: The Social Communication Intervention Project: A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of speech and language therapy for school-age children who have pragmatic and social communication problems with or without autism spectrum disorder There has recently been a strong push to increase language therapy for students with Pragmatic Language Impairments (PLI). Pragmatic language is an underexplored field that has increasing numbers of diagnoses year to year. No real therapy is implemented in school systems for children that have PLI. â€Å"There is little robust evidence of effectiveness of speech-language interventions which target the language, pragmatic or social communication needs of these children† (Adams, Earl, Freed, Gailet, Green, Law, Lockton, McBean, Nash, Vail, 2012, p 233). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of one particular type of language therapy aimed at children with PLI with or without Autism Spectrum Disorder. The aims of the study at hand were to â€Å"examine the effectiveness of an intensive manualized social communication speech and language intervention in improving language skills and observed pragmatic ability† (Adams, Earl, Freed, Gailet, Green, Law, Lockton, McBean, Nash, Vail, 2012, p 233). The study that was performed was a small-scale randomized controlled trial. The trial was aimed to compare the effects of Social Communication Intervention (SCIP) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) on a standardized language assessment. Children either received SCIP intervention or TAU intervention. The results then showed what type of intervention was more effective for children with PLI. Participants that received SCIP ceased all other intervention programs when they began this formal intervention program. Children that were receiving SCIP sat down for â€Å"16 to 20 individual face-to-face one hour sessions of intervention in school over the course of one school term† (Adams, Earl, Freed, Gailet, Green, Law, Lockton, McBean, Nash, Vail, 2012, p 236). Each child received an individualized intervention strategy that was derived from a manual as to ensure that intervention was consistent amongst all participants. Two specialist speech and language therapists and five specially trained therapy assistants delivered the experimental treatment. Children that received TAU continued with their regular/typical treatment that was being provided by their local speech and language therapy services. After the children had finished their intervention treatment plan for their pragmatic language impairment, they took the CLEF-4 to measure their general language ability. The participants also took a secondary outcome measure titled the Targeted Observation of Pragmatics in Children’s Conversation (TOPICC). The outcomes of the CLEF-4 along with secondary measures did not show a significant intervention effect for SCIP compared with TAU. The article does state, however, that â€Å"the overall conclusion provided in SCIP is effective at improving overall conversational quality in 6-11 year olds who have significant pragmatic and social communication needs compared with TAU† (Adams, Earl, Freed, Gailet, Green, Law, Lockton, McBean, Nash, Vail, 2012, p 242). These conclusions do not match the evidence that the study provides, however. This may be due to the fact that the children that were selected for this individualized intervention program were so diverse in their backgrounds and diagnoses. This sample was also small. Providing more research with a more consistent group may show results more of what the study intended. The amount of therapy was also constrained by the study. In reality, some of the children may have needed more or less therapy to achieve maximum potential. Although the results of the study were not consistent with the conclusion, the article does make some good points. More research must be done to show the effects of a structured individualized intervention program for students with PLI and ASD. With the increasing numbers of ASD diagnoses, PLI diagnoses soon too will be on the rise. Children deserve the best possible intervention and therapy needed, so why are children with PLI getting cut short of this due to lack of research? In the upcoming years, there is sure to be more done on this particular topic to ensure that students will in fact receive the treatment that they need. Section 3: Data Collection I had the opportunity to work with a student that I taught over the summer. ‘A’ is 8 years old and is in third grade. He is an energetic, fun, loving boy. A has Autism and trouble with his pragmatic language. Although A has never been formally diagnosed with a Pragmatic Language Impairment, it is evident that he shows the signs and symptoms. As discussed in the interview paper, A’s mother does not want him to be diagnosed with PLI for she does not want him to have another label on top of the others he already has. As I mentioned, I observed A first over the summer while I taught him at a camp which was for students with Autism and social difficulties. At first, A was a quiet and compliant student for the first week or so. However, I later found out he was only testing the waters. After A felt comfortable in the classroom, he swore on a regular basis, had social outbursts, never raised his hand, etc. A went from being an angel to one of the most difficult children in the classroom. I was baffled as to what we were supposed to do. On a regular basis, A was talking out of turn and was talking in ways not appropriate for students of his age. I also observed that A, when talking with a peer, did not allow his peer to engage in a conversation with him. It was a one-sided conversation, all with A talking. After talking to A’s mother about our concerns, I, along with my other classroom staff members, came up with a positive behavior plan that A used in his classroom and at home. I distinctly remember A’s mother telling us that she was so sorry that he was acting the way that we was and that it was probably because he wasn’t in his typical routine. I also remember her telling us that once we put into action this behavior plan that his pragmatic language difficulties would slightly decrease. And, just like she had promised, they did. A still swore when he was frustrated but instead of condemning him for this, we applauded him for using his words to communicate. However, we then asked him why he would use the words that he chose and once he calmed down we would ask him if he felt those words were appropriate for the context he used them. We would then brain storm together ideas of words that he could use instead of the swear words (or even inappropriate words). We would then replay the situation and A would use the words that were brainstormed rather than the original words that he chose. Another thing we began to do, not just with A, but with all of our children in our classroom was to use a tennis ball when having a conversation. We encouraged the children to pass the tennis ball back and forth when they were talking with one another to discourage one sided conversations. We told the children that they should not have the tennis ball the whole time they were talking and that you could only talk for long sentences if you had the tennis ball in your hands. We saw a great improvement not only in A’s conversations but in the conversations in all of the children as well. Along with my experiences with A over the summer, I got to see A in his classroom this year. Although I only got to spend a little over two hours with him, I saw a lot of the same techniques used over the summer in his classroom here as well. I think this is because of what his mother said to us over the summer: A does well with a consistent routine. The thing that I found interesting about A in his classroom is that his Therapeutic Support Staff (TSS) was the one who would talk to A if he had an outbreak. I am sure that this is because the teacher does not always have time to sit down and talk to A individually, but I personally feel that it is important to help shape A’s pragmatic language. Finally, I observed A in his home as well. I feel that A acts different in his home than in school because he knows how to push his mom and dad’s buttons. They of course use the same techniques in the classroom as they do at home. However, they are more firm with him. They expect a lot out of A. It is extremely evident that they love and care for him and they only want the best for him. That is why they have gone to such extreme measures to make him be as successful as possible in regards to his pragmatic language. (Checklist Attached from Observation) Section 4 Interview A=Student Where do you see (student) have the most difficulties with pragmatic language (i. e. in the classroom, at home, out in public)? -We feel that A has the most trouble with his pragmatic lang

Sigmund Freud’s -The Future of an Illusion Essay Example

Sigmund Freud’s -The Future of an Illusion Essay The Future of an Illusion is a book about religion written by Sigmund Freud, in the year 1927.   This book gives us the idea of some of the future studies conducted by Freud.   He begins his book by giving 2 characteristics of human civilization (vol. 1, pg. 1).   He speaks about the knowledge and technology developed to organize and exploit the natural resources, and developed society for fulfilling human requirements (vol. 1, pg. 2).   Human civilizations have also developed certain regulations to maintain a proper relationship between one another.   Human beings depend on one another, and the extent to which relationships can develop depends on the degree to which the natural wealth can satisfy instincts.   An individual can function as labor or as an object of sexuality for another individual.   In spite of civilization being an object of universal interest, each individual is potentially an enemy of civilization.   Civilization may have to defend itself from the individual and regulations need to be formed (vol. 1, pg. 6).   Freud feels that civilization should be based on coercion and renunciation of instinct.   Human beings contain a lot of destructive thoughts, thus anti-social behavior will arise.   This is capable of determining the behavior of a number of people.   Freud began to think of the extent to which it was possible to control instincts so as to restrict people.   However, he felt that is was very difficult to control a majority by a minority, who knows how to attain the methods to power and force (vol. 1, pg. 7).   Freud considers groups to be lazy and irresponsible and felt that certain individuals who could set examples could act as a leader for the group.   He was capable of performing the work necessary to maintain civilization.   Freud felt that humans instinctively did not like work and did not consider moral or intellectual issues against drives or passions (vol. 1, pg. 8).   In general humans functio n in accordance with their instincts and desires. Freud considered that since instincts were not satisfied by privation and frustration from human life, they had to be re-compensated.   He distinguishes between privations that affect everyone, and those that affect certain groups, classes and individuals.   Privations that affect individuals developed even before civilization, and are characterized by prohibitions formed when humanity began to detach itself from the animal condition.   These prohibitions are still existent (in the form of cannibalism, lust for destruction, etc) and are creating hostilities in civilization (vol. 2, pg. 10).   Freud felt that the Super ego has developed from social prohibitions.   Some people have become vehicles, rather than opponents, with influence from the super ego.   Cultures that have adopted prohibitions were secure (vol. 2, pg. 10).   Freud feels that the under-privileged classes of the society will envy the more favored ones.   This class will do whatever possible to free the mselves from their privation.   This could lead to dangers in civilization.   Hence, presence of under-privileged classes will always create hostilities in the society. We will write a custom essay sample on Sigmund Freud’s -The Future of an Illusion specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Sigmund Freud’s -The Future of an Illusion specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Sigmund Freud’s -The Future of an Illusion specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer According to Freud, civilizations are existent to protect us from nature.   However, nature is not under the control of civilization.   Freud feels that civilizations have still protected us from powerful forces such as terror.   Freud tries to personalize nature in order to demonstrate its power (vol. 3, pg. 16).   He considers that the forces of nature are converted in gods and goddesses as they have a paternal influence on humanity.   Gods have three tasks, namely reconciling humanity to the cruelty of fate, exorcising the horrors of nature and have to compensate human sufferings, and privation condemned by civilization.   However, with time these Gods and Goddesses have developed a role beyond nature.   Humanity now considers that Gods and Goddesses should protect us from the evils of civilization and reduce our suffering inflicted on one another.   Such human ideas of divinity protect against the dangers of nature and fate and from the evils existing in society i tself.   Freud considers that death is a new kind of existence that takes us to a higher form (vol. 3, pg. 19). Freud feels that religious ideas develop as a need to defend us from the superior forces of nature.   He also feels that another motive from the deficiencies of civilization inherent from religious beliefs is created (civilization may hand over ready made ideas to the individuals).   The individual in such circumstance may be incapable of discovering their inner selves (vol. 4, pg. 21). Freud considers religious ideas as teaching about the reality, which an individual has not yet discovered.   Religious beliefs have three characteristics, namely they ought to be believed (as they have been by our ancestors), evidence has been reported by our ancestors and questions against religious beliefs are forbidden.   Many people have doubts about religious beliefs, but pressure imposed upon them has suppressed their urge to ask questions (vol. 5, pg. 27).   Freud has also attempted to justify religious viewpoints in two ways.   The first one was being followed by the early Christian church and is beyond human reasoning (truth should be felt inside and cannot be explained or understood).   In the second one, Freud says that human thought activities include a number of hypotheses which may be baseless, but due to certain reasons we begin to believe as if these fictions were true. Freud believes that regarding the psychical origin of religious ideas, humanity has adopted them and they have become our strongest and oldest desires.   He feels that they are illusions or desires to protect us from the forces of nature.   He considers that illusions arise from mistakes made in fulfilling desires.   Since illusions are derived from human desires, they may seem like psychic delusions.   This may differ from religious illusions in their association with reality and falseness (delusions oppose reality, whereas illusions need not always oppose reality).   A belief may become an illusion when in trying to fulfill a wish from motivation, are unable to do it due to the reality situation (vol. 6, pg. 31).   Hence most religious concepts are illusions as no individual can be forced to believe them, nor can the concepts be proved or disproved.   However, no one can be forced to disbelieve a religion. Freud also considers that many other illusions exist in nature, which through unwritten rules are forbidden to talk about.   Freud considers that religion has done a lot of benefits for the society by calming antisocial instincts (vol. 7, pg. 37).   Many people have benefited from the fact that religion ruling civilization, and no wants to change it because they are satisfied.   However, some people are unhappy with civilization and are trying to alter it.   They may try to isolate themselves from society.   Science has made advancements such that religion may not affect so much as it previously did. Freud feels that the insecurities of life have has united society and has prevented one from killing another.   This is how justice and punishment has developed.   By killing somebody we are really going against cultural prohibitions and against God’s intentions (vol. 8, pg. 40).   God has become a part of human culture, that it is very difficult to separate God (as rules are differing in nature suggest human insufficiency).   It would be better to remove God from the cultural system and consider it to be a kind of human origin for all rules and regulations of civilization.   Freud says that such rules have been recognized to serve us; hence we tend to blindly accept them, and aim for improving them rather than eliminating them.   Freud considers this to be a step-forward in the road of civilization (vol. 8, no. 41). Freud points out that just as a child while entering into adulthood, enters into a some form of neurosis (due to suppression of instincts), in the same way humanity has gone through several stages including neurosis (includes human ignorance and weakness of the mind), such that sacrifice of certain instincts was necessary for existence of the society.   In the same way, religion developed out of universal neurosis (an association with our father).   Believe in these universal neurosis safeguards believers who have high chances of developing neurotic disorders. Some feel that Freud’s ideas of not believing in God are dangerous to civilization.   Besides obedient followers to religion are being considered as neurotics.   However, Freud feels that his ideas are harmless and no believer would let go of his or her faith.   Freud feels that intellectual weakness may often be due to religious education (vol. 9, pg. 46).   He also considers that a religious believer would not let go off his beliefs easily, either through arguments or prohibitions (vol. 9, pg. 49). Freud feels that in the long-run religious concepts will be disregarded, even if the initial attempts fail.   This is because reason and experience would survive the test of time.   He considers that science has the power to gain more knowledge of the reality, thus increasing our forces.   If we tend to consider that such beliefs are illusions, then it would be like considering some untrue beliefs.   Science is able to prove several things about reality through evidence.   Scientific evidence can be tested in nature, and would evolve if proven false.